What is an injunction, and how can it legally stop someone’s actions?

Introduction

In the legal world, disputes between individuals, businesses, and even government entities often require immediate court intervention to prevent harm or unlawful conduct. One of the most powerful tools available to courts in Orangeburg, SC, and across the country is an injunction—a legal order that compels an individual or entity to either do something (mandatory injunction) or refrain from doing something (prohibitory injunction). But what exactly is an injunction, and how does it function as a mechanism for stopping unwanted actions? This article explores the nature of injunctions, their different types, how they are granted, and their legal impact.

Judge Writing On Paper In Courtroom

Understanding Injunctions

An injunction is a court order that legally restrains a person, company, or entity from performing certain actions or requires them to undertake specific actions. Injunctions are often sought in civil litigation where monetary damages would be insufficient to remedy the harm.

In Orangeburg, SC, local courts frequently issue injunctions to protect businesses and residents from immediate harm.

Injunctions can serve multiple purposes, including:

  • Preventing ongoing harm to an individual or business
  • Preserving the status quo in a dispute until a final decision is made
  • Stopping illegal or unethical behavior before it causes further damage
  • Enforcing contractual agreements when one party is acting in violation of agreed-upon terms

Because injunctions can significantly impact the rights of the parties involved, courts carefully consider several legal factors before issuing one.

Types of Injunctions

There are several types of injunctions, each serving a different purpose depending on the situation and urgency of the case. The primary types include:

1. Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)

A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is an emergency measure granted by the court to prevent immediate harm. TROs are typically issued without a full hearing, and they only last for a short period—often just a few days or weeks—until a more thorough court review can take place.

TROs are commonly used for cases such as:

  • Domestic violence cases to prevent an abuser from contacting the victim
  • Business disputes to stop a company from engaging in unlawful competition
  • Intellectual property cases to prevent unauthorized use of copyrighted materials

Because TROs are issued quickly, the requesting party must demonstrate an urgent and irreparable risk of harm if the order is not granted.

2. Preliminary Injunction

A Preliminary Injunction is a more extended version of a TRO. It is granted after a hearing where both parties present their arguments and evidence. Unlike a TRO, which is temporary and given in urgent situations, a preliminary injunction remains in place throughout the legal proceedings until a final verdict is reached.

To obtain a preliminary injunction, the requesting party must show:

  • A likelihood of success in the case
  • That they will suffer irreparable harm without the injunction
  • That issuing the injunction is in the public interest
  • That the balance of hardships favors them over the opposing party

This type of injunction is often used in cases involving patent infringements, corporate lawsuits, and labor disputes. In Orangeburg, SC, businesses may seek preliminary injunctions to prevent unfair competition or breaches of contract.

 

3. Permanent Injunction

A Permanent Injunction is issued as part of the final judgment of a case. It permanently restricts or mandates certain actions by the defendant, preventing future violations of the law or agreements.

Some examples include:

Closeup of gavel judgement concept
  • Prohibiting a company from producing counterfeit goods
  • Forcing a polluting factory to shut down operations permanently
  • Preventing a stalker from ever contacting their victim again

Since a permanent injunction is final, it requires substantial legal proof, and the court must be convinced that monetary damages alone would not suffice to resolve the dispute.

4. Mandatory Injunction

While most injunctions are prohibitory (they stop actions), a Mandatory Injunction forces an individual or business to perform a specific action. These are less common and are issued when inaction would cause serious harm or injustice.

Examples include:

  • Requiring a company to remove toxic waste from a contaminated site
  • Compelling a landlord to make necessary repairs to a rental property
  • Ordering a party to fulfill a contractual obligation

Courts are typically reluctant to issue mandatory injunctions unless the requesting party can prove a clear legal right to the demand.

How Are Injunctions Granted?

Courts consider several factors when deciding whether to issue an injunction. The party requesting the injunction must file a petition and provide strong legal arguments supported by evidence. The key elements judges examine include:

  1. Likelihood of Success – The plaintiff must show that they have a strong case and are likely to win in a trial.
  2. Irreparable Harm – There must be evidence that the harm cannot be undone simply by awarding money damages later.
  3. Balance of Hardships – The court assesses whether the harm prevented by the injunction outweighs any burden placed on the opposing party.
  4. Public Interest – If the injunction affects broader public concerns, such as environmental protection or consumer rights, the court considers those factors as well.

After reviewing these elements, the judge will decide whether to grant or deny the injunction.

Handcuffs And Judge Gavel On Wooden Background

Legal Consequences of Violating an Injunction

Injunctions are legally binding court orders. Violating them can lead to severe consequences, including:

  • Contempt of Court: A person or entity that disobeys an injunction can be found in contempt, leading to fines or imprisonment.
  • Financial Penalties: Courts may impose monetary sanctions on those who ignore an injunction.
  • Additional Legal Action: If a person or business continues to violate an injunction, the opposing party may pursue further legal remedies, such as requesting stronger enforcement measures.

Because of these consequences, individuals and businesses must take injunctions seriously and comply with their terms.

Real-World Examples of Injunctions

  • Technology Disputes: A court issued an injunction preventing Apple from selling certain iPhones due to patent infringement claims.
  • Celebrity Restraining Orders: Many celebrities obtain injunctions (often in the form of restraining orders) against stalkers or intrusive paparazzi.
  • Environmental Protection: Courts have issued injunctions stopping companies from dumping hazardous waste into rivers.

Conclusion

Injunctions are one of the most powerful legal tools available to courts, allowing them to swiftly stop harmful actions or enforce compliance with the law. Whether used to protect businesses, individuals, or the public, injunctions play a critical role in maintaining justice and preventing irreparable harm. If you believe an injunction may be necessary in your situation, consulting with an experienced attorney is crucial to navigating the legal complexities involved.

For more legal guidance on obtaining or contesting an injunction in Orangeburg, SC, contact The Bill Connor Law Firm today. Attorney Bill Connor can provide expert advice and representation tailored to your specific needs.

author avatar
Attorney Bill Connor Owner
William M. Connor V stands as a paragon of legal excellence and dedicated service. His background blends an impressive legal career with a distinguished military background to the rank of Colonel (with a career spanning various commands, including as senior US advisor to Helmand Province, Afghanistan). Bill was a runoff candidate for Lt. Governor of South Carolina in 2010, and in 2021 received the state’s highest award from SC Governor McMaster, the Order of the Palmetto. After only six years of legal practice (which included time deployed to combat), Bill was recognized by his peers as having the highest possible ranking ethical standards and competency, earning him the prestigious AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rating by Martindale- Hubbell®. In 2021, Bill was elected by fellow Citadel Alumni to serve on the prestigious Citadel Board of Visitors. Bill has attained several seven figure resolutions for clients, including a multi- million dollar settlement in 2023 and over a million dollar resolution in 2024